info

platform:

Genesis

Genre:

Puzzle

Publisher:

Electronic Arts

Developer:

Michael Schwartz

Difficulty:

Adjustable

No. of Players:

1 or 2 players

Released:

1991

Media

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

In Game Picture

Review

Marble Madness

By: Carl-Johan Brax | July 14, 2008

Marble Madness is a classic game like no else. It was released in the arcades in 1984, with the later Sega employed Mark Cerny as the creator. It was ported to a lot of computers and consoles, with the Mega Drive port being one of the later ones. It was done by Michael Schwartz, who is falsely advertised as the creator of the game, when he is in fact only the porter. The guy even has an "Artist's Bio" and a picture of him (together with the sound programmer, who we will get back to) at the first two pages of the manual. For shame!

From a isometric view, much like in Sonic 3D: Flickies' Island and Landstalker: The Treasure of King Nole, you are controlling a ball with the simple aim to reach the goal on six levels. The ball can be controlled either like the D-pad's directions, or by following the grid (like in Landstalker). You can also use the Atari 2600 trackball. For turbo mode, hold A, B or C when directing the ball.

To reach the goal, you have to fight against time, enemies and the level itself. The enemies that can destroy you are for example Acid Slime and birds called Pterodactyls. Others, like the black ball, hammers, and Marble Munchers are mostly just in your way to steal time. It doesn't matter how many times your ball gets destroyed, because you always get a new one as long as you have time, but staying alive is best because death animations take time. When the clock ticks to zero, the game is over. You have only one chance to beat all six levels, but since the game can be completed in just a few minutes, it doesn't matter. The time you have left when beating a level is given to you as a bonus in the next one. There are three difficulty settings, but the only difference between them is the amount of seconds you are given for each level. Like most of the games from the era, the aim is to get a good score rather than to see the epic ending. By defeating enemies, dying as few times as possible and finishing with as much time as possible, you will be able to get a higher score.

There is a competitive two-player mode. If one of the players has the other one get out of the screen, the leading player gets five extra seconds and the second one gets teleported close to him/her. One minor benefit of this mode is the different routes it gives the second player. It is also always nice to be able to play with a friend.

Despite being very close to the arcade, the graphics actually disappoint me. The colours are very bland and look like they have been in a washing machine with bleach. At least they are very clean and easy on your eyes, so you know what you are seeing and doing. The sprites are well animated, especially the ball itself. More and better use of colours shouldn't be too much to ask for though.

The guy responsible for the sound in this version is named Steve Hayes. He might be a programmer, but he is certainly no musician. The music presented in this game is atrocious. It is noisy, most often without any thought out composition and it seriously nearly gave me a headache. The best part of it is the enjoyment you feel when it is finally off. Since it is present in other versions as well, Mister Hayes shouldn't take full credit for it either. Whoever wants to put his name on something that sounds like a fire truck alarm which is supposed to act as music must lack education. The few sound effects are either anonymous or annoying. All in all, the sound of Marble Madness is worse than that of Dark Castle, a port from around the same time.

Marble Madness is quite a fun game, although a little frustrating in the end. It is original, addictive, plays pretty well, and has a two-player mode. It sounds like it should have a great score, right? Yes, but then we haven't revealed all its shortcomings yet. For starters, a direct port of a seven year-old arcade game that can be beaten in minutes isn't fit to be a Mega Drive game, something said by Mr. Cerny himself. You don't want to pay 495 Swedish kronor on such a short game, so that is why I got my copy for 16 SEK, used.

Arcade ports seldom give the players what they want on the Mega Drive. If the arcade system is more advanced, the port naturally becomes worse and people complain about it. In the case of Marble Madness, the Mega Drive is almost powerful enough to make it arcade perfect, and the port almost is, so why complain? The game is on a 4 Mbit ROM, like the first Sonic, so there should be much more content added to justify the high price of a home version. More levels, updated graphics, listenable audio and new gameplay features are things that I'm talking about. A good example of a game that does this right is Pengo, a vastly improved home version on the Mega Drive.

Although the few minutes you play Marble Madness are enjoyable, the fun wears out due to the small amount of content that is repeated all the time. You can buy a bottle of soda for the same price, and just like it, the taste is best when first opened with the most carbonic acid. But once the bottle is emptied quickly, there is not much more to do than put it away or recycle it for more soda later. Marble Madness might be worth the few minutes of fun for a buck or two, just don't expect an extraordinary, lengthy Mega Drive experience.

Reviewer Score: 4.0   |   Avg. Reader Score: 5.3
<<Discuss this Review>>

 

Comments


Add a Comment:
(you must be a registered forum member to comment)

Username:

Password:

Score:

Comment (400 characters left):


Current Comments:
User:Score:Date:Comment:
Melf 4 January 03, 2010 No trackball, no sale.
 
goldenband 5 January 03, 2010 Testing to see if a short comment will work...
 
vintagegamecrazy 5 August 26, 2008 Something about this port feels pretty bad. It must be the sluggish control, either way it's pretty lame compared to the nes version.
 
TheEdge 7 August 25, 2008 Graphics were 1000% better than the NES, I give it a 7 just because if you have a whole room of people hanging out this is a great game for passing the controller around. Good game, need skill to play it. Fun for hours. I dont agree with the score at all.
 
Ash 7 July 16, 2008 Damn, you really gave this game a beating. It certainly wasn\'t worse than the NES version. The music is a bit rough but I concentrate more on staying alive. I am a bit surprised Tengen didn\'t produce this themselves, I can\'t imagine the sound being any better if Mr. Earl Vickers put his deaf-ear touch to it. The Atari 2600 ball would be awesome, I need to try that out.
 
JimboTFU 7 July 15, 2008 Good fun yet often frustrating, Marble Madness entertains and annoys in equal measure. Controls are rather sluggish (would love to have tried it with the Atari track ball!) But it has an eery atmosphere, helped by some memorably spooky music....overall a pretty good game if you have patience.
 
Yurf 5 July 15, 2008 Great concept. I didn't like the controls though...
 
megabomberman 6 July 15, 2008 Sure it was sucky but the game is so fun and addictive I can appreciate it for what it is..
 
Joe Redifer 2 July 14, 2008 This is probably the worst version of Marble Madness I have ever played. They didn't even try to take advantage of the Genesis' INFINITE 16-bit super mega power. I would be ashamed to have my name on this game.